Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alfred Perlstein
Тема Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD
Дата
Msg-id 53554AD9.3040408@freebsd.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Ответы Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 4/21/14 9:38 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> On 04/21/2014 12:25 PM, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> 1. OS developers are not the target audience for GUCs. If the OS 
>>> developers want to test and can't be botherrd with building with a 
>>> couple of different parameters then I'm not very impressed.
>>>
>>> 2. We should be trying to get rid of GUCs where possible, and only 
>>> add them when we must. The more there are the more we confuse users. 
>>> If a packager can pick a default surely they can pick build options 
>>> too.
>> Thank you for the lecture Andrew!  Really pleasant way to treat a 
>> user and a fan of the system. :)
>>
>>
>
> I confess to being mightily confused.

Sure, to clarify:

Andrew, you just told someone who in a db stack sits both below (as a 
pgsql user 15 years) and above (as a FreeBSD kernel dev 15 years) your 
software what they "really need".

-Alfred



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Composite Datums containing toasted fields are a bad idea(?)
Следующее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD