Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD

On 04/21/2014 12:25 PM, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>
>>>
>>
>> 1. OS developers are not the target audience for GUCs. If the OS 
>> developers want to test and can't be botherrd with building with a 
>> couple of different parameters then I'm not very impressed.
>>
>> 2. We should be trying to get rid of GUCs where possible, and only 
>> add them when we must. The more there are the more we confuse users. 
>> If a packager can pick a default surely they can pick build options too.
> Thank you for the lecture Andrew!  Really pleasant way to treat a user 
> and a fan of the system. :)
>
>

I confess to being mightily confused.

cheers

andrew