Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes:
> * Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
>> Quite aside from any security risks, that means that running "make
>> installcheck" twice in a row fails. Please fix.
> Right, will do, though one kind of requires the other (we can't drop the
> only user we know how to connect as which is a superuser...). I'll
> figure out a way to make it work though.
Instead of physically reconnecting, could you do SET ROLE or SET SESSION
AUTHORIZATION? I think that's what we do in the core tests.
> I'm at least somewhat suspicious it has to do with loading the library,
> since we (pretty clearly..) didn't test that much as it's not really
> intended.
There are several more crashes in the BF now. They're not at initial
library load AFAICS. Hard to tell if it's platform-specific or just
randomly fails sometimes. Have you tried valgrind to see if there's
uninitialized-memory touches?
regards, tom lane