On 04/20/2011 04:09 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 21:54, Tom Lane<tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Peter Eisentraut<peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
>>> I would imagine one commit fest per month, but
>>> it's only a week long.
>> BTW, just as a thought experiment: what about a one-day CF once a week?
>> "Patch Tuesdays", if you will. Spend all day reviewing/committing,
>> bounce back whatever is not ready, patch authors try again next week.
> I think that would pretty much kill the process for any committer who
> is not employed to work full-time on postgresql *development*. Those
> who have other dayjobs (which may well be postgresql consulting or
> training or whatever) will probably end up dealing with significantly
> fewer patches, leaving even more of the burden on those who do have
> the dedicated schedule. I know I don't do as much reviewing/comitting
> as I'd like to do during the commitfests, but with a process like
> that, it would probably become more or less zero.
>
Yeah, I can't organize my time that way either.
cheers
andrew