Re: Regression tests versus the buildfarm environment
| От | Andrew Dunstan |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Regression tests versus the buildfarm environment |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4C630D41.6090105@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Regression tests versus the buildfarm environment (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Regression tests versus the buildfarm environment
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 08/11/2010 04:47 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Andrew Dunstan<andrew@dunslane.net> writes: >> Another way would be to have pg_regress honour an environment var like >> PG_REGRESS_PORT, which the buildfarm script could use. > Yeah, that would work too. (Is it portable to Windows, though?) Should be > I prefer the change-the-default approach mainly because it wouldn't > require any documentation, whereas it'd be a bit hard to argue that > environment variables etc shouldn't be documented ... > > Yeah. The other advantage is that we would not need to wait until we had got everyone to update their versions of the buildfarm code. So I agree this is the nicest solution. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: