On 08/11/2010 10:23 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>
>> Or we could do something like
>>
>> port = 0xC000 ^ (DEF_PGPORT& 0x7FFF);
>>
>> which is absolutely guaranteed not to conflict with DEF_PGPORT, at the
>> cost of possibly shifting into the 32K-48K port number range if you
>> had set DEF_PGPORT above 48K.
> I like XOR a lot better than OR.
>
For years we told people to make sure they picked 4 digit port numbers
for the buildfarm, and while I removed that note recently it can be put
back. So I don't think there's much danger - let's got with XOR.
cheers
andrew