Guillaume Lelarge a écrit :
> Dave Page a écrit :
>> On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 10:23 PM, Guillaume
>> Lelarge<guillaume@lelarge.info> wrote:
>>> Dave Page a écrit :
>>>> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Kevin Field <kevinjamesfield@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> About editing, I just tried this in the win32 beta3, and it still
>>>>> ignores the changes you make: I went to create a new job step,
>>>>> selected batch, typed gibberish in the name and definition, unchecked
>>>>> 'read only', and erased the generated SQL and replaced it with "select
>>>>> 'hello'", and then clicked OK, and it added the gibberish step (rather
>>>>> than doing nothing, which is what select-hello should've done...) So
>>>>> 'read only' doesn't seem to be useful at this point.
>>>> Oh, I see what you mean. If memory serves, the pgAgent dialogues
>>>> process their SQL in a slightly different way to all the other
>>>> dialogues because they need to run some parts in different steps.
>>>>
>>>> Guillaume; this is your code ( :-p ) - do you see a simple way to fix
>>>> it, or should the checkboxes be disabled on the three pgAgent
>>>> dialogues?
>>>>
>>> Actually, it's not really useful in that context. We should simply
>>> disable the checkbox on these dialogs. Perhaps we don't even need an SQL
>>> tab?
>> I think it's still useful to display the SQL, if only to allow the
>> user to see what pgAdmin is going to do. Disabling (better yet,
>> removing) the checkbox on those dialogues seems like the right answer.
>>
>> Can you do that in the next day or so?
>>
>
> I'll work on a patch for this tonight.
>
Here it is.
--
Guillaume.
http://www.postgresqlfr.org
http://dalibo.com