Dave Page a écrit :
> On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 10:23 PM, Guillaume
> Lelarge<guillaume@lelarge.info> wrote:
>> Dave Page a écrit :
>>> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Kevin Field <kevinjamesfield@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> About editing, I just tried this in the win32 beta3, and it still
>>>> ignores the changes you make: I went to create a new job step,
>>>> selected batch, typed gibberish in the name and definition, unchecked
>>>> 'read only', and erased the generated SQL and replaced it with "select
>>>> 'hello'", and then clicked OK, and it added the gibberish step (rather
>>>> than doing nothing, which is what select-hello should've done...) So
>>>> 'read only' doesn't seem to be useful at this point.
>>> Oh, I see what you mean. If memory serves, the pgAgent dialogues
>>> process their SQL in a slightly different way to all the other
>>> dialogues because they need to run some parts in different steps.
>>>
>>> Guillaume; this is your code ( :-p ) - do you see a simple way to fix
>>> it, or should the checkboxes be disabled on the three pgAgent
>>> dialogues?
>>>
>> Actually, it's not really useful in that context. We should simply
>> disable the checkbox on these dialogs. Perhaps we don't even need an SQL
>> tab?
>
> I think it's still useful to display the SQL, if only to allow the
> user to see what pgAdmin is going to do. Disabling (better yet,
> removing) the checkbox on those dialogues seems like the right answer.
>
> Can you do that in the next day or so?
>
I'll work on a patch for this tonight.
--
Guillaume.
http://www.postgresqlfr.org
http://dalibo.com