Tino Wildenhain wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> On Tue, 2008-12-30 at 18:20 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 2008-12-30 at 15:50 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> * Low-tech, standard tools available through FreeBSD ports
>>>>> collection, or whatever the sysadmins want to deal with.
>>>>>
>>>>> * PostgreSQL-themable.
>>>>>
>>>>> * Preferrably understandable and maintainable by more than one person.
>>>>>
>>>>> Recommendations would be greatly appreciated.
>>>> Drupal.
>>> I think that mail fail point nr 1 above :-P
>>
>> Drupal is in ports. It is already used within the standard network
>> (pugs), is themeable, and for what Peter wants is a frankly perfect
>> choice.
>>
> I still wonder why the web stuff for the postgres site seems so sticked
> to PHP. My personal opinion is it just does not match up with the
> overall quality of the project. But sure I can't say much on the
> expertise of the web and system team when it comes to scripting
> languages and web frameworks.
Today, I'd say the main reason it looks the way it does is legacy. We
have code. It's looked that way for a while. nad it works pretty well.
I'm more concerned about the html/layout side of things where we
currently don't have anybody who *really* knows how things are tied
together between the HTML and the CSS. It's very much a guessing game
whenever we try to change something... So if you want to offer your
services, that's a good place to start :D
/Magnus