Re: WIP: default values for function parameters
| От | Andrew Dunstan |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: WIP: default values for function parameters |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4942CDA4.9060705@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: WIP: default values for function parameters (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: WIP: default values for function parameters
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org> writes:
>
>> On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 10:06:30AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>>> Hmm ... actually, ecpg might be a problem here anyway. I know it has
>>> special meaning for :name, but does it allow space between the colon
>>> and the name? If it does then the colon syntax loses. If it doesn't
>>>
>
>
>> No. Here's the lexer rule:
>> <SQL>:{identifier}((("->"|\.){identifier})|(\[{array}\]))*
>> No space possible between ":" and {identifier}.
>>
>
> Excellent. I checked that psql's colon-variable feature behaves the
> same. So it looks like the proposed "name: value" syntax would indeed
> not break any existing features. Barring better ideas I think we should
> go with that one.
>
>
>
Does that mean the whitespace following the : will be required? (I could
figure it out but brain is otherwise occupied).
cheers
andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: