Re: generic pseudotype IO functions?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: generic pseudotype IO functions?
Дата
Msg-id 4861.1389025709@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: generic pseudotype IO functions?  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Ответы Re: generic pseudotype IO functions?  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> On 1/6/14, 10:29 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> This will break some of the function sanity checks in opr_sanity,

> Then the tests can be changed.

That will weaken their ability to detect actual mistakes, no?

If there were a large benefit to merging the pseudotype I/O functions,
I'd think this would be acceptable; but merging them seems of mighty
marginal value.
        regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: dynamic shared memory and locks
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Convert Datum* to char*