Re: Avoid unecessary MemSet call (src/backend/utils/cache/relcache.c)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: Avoid unecessary MemSet call (src/backend/utils/cache/relcache.c)
Дата
Msg-id 4772a6f5-0942-e073-965e-d45fd1243765@enterprisedb.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Avoid unecessary MemSet call (src/backend/utils/cache/relcache.c)  (Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Avoid unecessary MemSet call (src/backend/utils/cache/relcache.c)  (Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com>)
Re: Avoid unecessary MemSet call (src/backend/utils/cache/relcache.c)  (Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 19.05.22 18:09, Ranier Vilela wrote:
> Taking it a step further.
> Created a new patch into commitfest, targeting 16 version.
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/38/3645/ 
> <https://commitfest.postgresql.org/38/3645/>

I have committed your 001 patch, which was clearly a (harmless) mistake.

I have also committed a patch that gets rid of MemSet() calls where the 
value is a constant not-0, because that just falls back to memset() anyway.

I'm on board with trying to get rid of MemSet(), but first I need to 
analyze all the performance numbers and arguments that were shown in 
this thread.



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "David G. Johnston"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: doc: Clarify what "excluded" represents for INSERT ON CONFLICT
Следующее
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: doc: Clarify what "excluded" represents for INSERT ON CONFLICT