Re: WAL segment question
От | Chander Ganesan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: WAL segment question |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 46B7A6A6.9010401@otg-nc.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | WAL segment question ("Donald Fraser" <postgres@kiwi-fraser.net>) |
Список | pgsql-admin |
Donald Fraser wrote:
DRBD is a synchronous method of transferring data - it's not asynchronous. Assuming you are using Protocol C you should find that both are always in sync. If you are using protocol B then things will be in sync so long as the remote system didn't crash, and if you are using Protocol A then things should be in sync as long as the local system didn't crash. Our company has two sites, a master and a disaster recovery site.I am trying to assess whether data has been lost during a fail-over, due to the asynchronous method of transporting WAL file data between sites (we use DRBD).Disaster recovery node start-up log:user= pid=9907 timestamp=[2007-08-01 17:09:51 BST] tid= LOG: record with zero length at 0/7C62F52C
user= pid=9907 timestamp=[2007-08-01 17:09:51 BST] tid= LOG: redo done at 0/7C62F4E8My question is: given the above WAL segment information, can I use it to decide whether information was lost in the master database site, at the point of failure, without starting the database up?RegardsDonald Fraser.
-- Chander Ganesan Open Technology Group, Inc. One Copley Parkway, Suite 210 Morrisville, NC 27560 919-463-0999/866-229-3386 http://www.otg-nc.com
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: