Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
>>>> Maybe it's BSD which is different from the license of psqlodbc (LGPL).
>>>> Is there no problem with their coexistence ?
>>>> Or is it possible for psqlodbc to be LGPL entirely ?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> I am having difficulty in understanding what the problem is. My
>>> understanding is that using BSD licensed code is ok in an LGPL
>>> project, but (probably) not vice versa.
>>
>> To my knowledge you can do it either way, as long as you remember that
>> any changes to the lgpl code have to be released.
>
> Could you tell me a recommendation ?
> I feel completely LGPL one is simpler.
If you are asking me, which code you should release under, I would
suggest the LGPL as the psqlodbc driver is licensed under the LGPL.
Joshua D. Drake
>
> Thanks.
>
> Hiroshi Inoue
>