Tom Lane wrote:
> So in a roundabout way we come back
> to the idea that we need a bug tracker (NOT a patch tracker), plus
> people putting in the effort to make sure it stays a valid source
> of up-to-date info. Without the latter it won't really be useful.
>
>
>
Hallelujah Brother!
BTW, a bug tracker can be used as a patch tracker, although the reverse
isn't true. For example, the BZ people use BZ that way, in fact - most
patches arrive as attachments to bugs. And trackers can be used just as
well for tracking features as well as bugs.
cheers
andrew