Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>> Personally, I doubt there's any great use case for DNS names. Like Tom
>> says, if it involves much more that removing the AI_NUMERICHOST hint
>> then let's forget it.
>
> Perhaps more to the point: let's do that and wait to see if the field
> demand justifies expending lots of sweat on anything smarter. Given
> that we've gone this long with only allowing numeric IPs in pg_hba.conf,
> I suspect we'll find that few people really care.
Well as one of the people that deploys and managees many, many
postgresql installations I can say I have never run into the need to
have dns names and the thought of dns names honestly seems silly. It
will increase overhead and dependencies that I just wouldn't want in my
installations.
Joshua D. Drake
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
--
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/