Re: A Modest Upgrade Proposal

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jim Nasby
Тема Re: A Modest Upgrade Proposal
Дата
Msg-id 42bcaeeb-80f5-1eae-5cc8-7f36f97f0485@BlueTreble.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: A Modest Upgrade Proposal  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Ответы Re: A Modest Upgrade Proposal  (Jan Wieck <jan@wi3ck.info>)
Re: A Modest Upgrade Proposal  (Petr Jelinek <petr@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 7/13/16 2:06 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On 07/07/2016 01:01 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>
>> There was an unconference session on this topic at PGCon and quite a
>> number of people there stated that they found DDL to be an ease-of-use
>> feature and wanted to have it.
>
> Yeah, I haven't meet anyone yet that would like to have:
>
> select replicate_these_relations('['public']);
>
> vs:
>
> ALTER SCHEMA public ENABLE REPLICATION;
>
> (or something like that).

I generally agree, but I think the more important question is "Why?". Is 
it becouse DDL looks more like a sentence? Is it because arrays are a 
PITA? Is it too hard to call functions?
-- 
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532)   mobile: 512-569-9461



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: application_name in process name?
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: One process per session lack of sharing