Re: A Modest Upgrade Proposal
| От | Jim Nasby |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: A Modest Upgrade Proposal |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 42bcaeeb-80f5-1eae-5cc8-7f36f97f0485@BlueTreble.com обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: A Modest Upgrade Proposal ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: A Modest Upgrade Proposal
Re: A Modest Upgrade Proposal |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 7/13/16 2:06 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On 07/07/2016 01:01 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>
>> There was an unconference session on this topic at PGCon and quite a
>> number of people there stated that they found DDL to be an ease-of-use
>> feature and wanted to have it.
>
> Yeah, I haven't meet anyone yet that would like to have:
>
> select replicate_these_relations('['public']);
>
> vs:
>
> ALTER SCHEMA public ENABLE REPLICATION;
>
> (or something like that).
I generally agree, but I think the more important question is "Why?". Is
it becouse DDL looks more like a sentence? Is it because arrays are a
PITA? Is it too hard to call functions?
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532) mobile: 512-569-9461
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: