Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> You would actually have to have a set. What I believe you are trying to
> do is transform a list to a result set. I don't think you can do that
> without some additional programming within the function.
>
> Somebody may know of a better way but what I would think would happen is
> this:
>
> Break up list, insert each value of list into a temp table as a row,
> return set of temp table.
Is there a way to represent a set of constant rows in SQL, aside from
creating a temp table & populating it? I've had need of this before -
IIRC, something was mentioned about the SQL VALUES construct being
unimplemented.
--
Peter Fein pfein@pobox.com 773-575-0694
Basically, if you're not a utopianist, you're a schmuck. -J. Feldman