Rainer J. H. Brandt wrote:
>>A while ago we had a client running PostgreSQL on a Quad v440, and the
>>performance was horrific. There are some known issues with PostgreSQL
>>and solaris. AFAIK there was a kernel patch to alleviate some of the
>>issues, but i'm unsure of the state of this as its been sometime since
>>i've had any experience with PostgreSQL and solaris.
>>
>>
>
>Can anyone remember specific information?
>
>
It been too long to remember exact specifics, but it was something very
similar to this problem.
http://sunportal.sunmanagers.org/pipermail/summaries/2003-March/003254.html
You might also want to have a look at this, although most of these
issues are very old and have probably been resolved by now.
http://www.phil.uni-erlangen.de/tree/postgresql/majordomo/pgsql-novice-digest/v01.n098
>The only detail I remember about performance under Solaris is a discussion
>about slow qsort:
>http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2002-04/msg00103.php
>
>A quick search didn't turn up information about whether the build
>process now replaces Sun's qsort, or whether Sun has improved qsort
>since the problem was noticed by postgres users in 2002.
>
>It'd be interesting to invest some time studying the sources at
>opensolaris.org.
>
>Rainer
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Rainer J. H. Brandt email: rjhb@bb-c.de
>Brandt & Brandt Computer GmbH web: www.bb-c.de
>Kamberg 111 phone: +49 2448 919126
>D 53940 Hellenthal mobile: +49 172 9593205
>
>
>
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
>
>
>
--
Marc McIntyre
MySource Matrix Lead Developer