Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable
Дата
Msg-id 415.1201758127@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Ответы Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Re: {**Spam**} Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable  (Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> OK, but keep in mind if we use synchronized_seqscans in pg_dump we will
> have to recognize that GUC forever.

No, because it's being used on the query side, not in the emitted dump.
We have *never* promised that pg_dump version N could dump from server
version N+1 .., in fact, personally I'd like to make that case be a hard
error, rather than something people could override with -i.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Oops - BF:Mastodon just died
Следующее
От: Decibel!
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Truncate Triggers