Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > OK, but keep in mind if we use synchronized_seqscans in pg_dump we will
> > have to recognize that GUC forever.
> 
> No, because it's being used on the query side, not in the emitted dump.
> We have *never* promised that pg_dump version N could dump from server
> version N+1 .., in fact, personally I'd like to make that case be a hard
> error, rather than something people could override with -i.

Oh, yea, interesting, it is part of the connection.  That will help.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://postgres.enterprisedb.com
 + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +