Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable
Дата
Msg-id 200801310215.m0V2FZG15153@momjian.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > Another question --- why don't we just turn off synchronized_seqscans
> > when we do COPY TO?  That would fix pg_dump and be transparent.
> 
> Enforcing this from the server side seems a pretty bad idea.  Note that
> there were squawks about having pg_dump behave this way at all; if the
> control is on the pg_dump side then at least we have the chance to make
> it a user option later.
> 
> Also, you forgot about pg_dump -d.

OK, but keep in mind if we use synchronized_seqscans in pg_dump we will
have to recognize that GUC forever.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://postgres.enterprisedb.com
 + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Christopher Browne"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCHES] Better default_statistics_target
Следующее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Oops - BF:Mastodon just died