Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable

Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> Another question --- why don't we just turn off synchronized_seqscans
> when we do COPY TO?  That would fix pg_dump and be transparent.

Enforcing this from the server side seems a pretty bad idea.  Note that
there were squawks about having pg_dump behave this way at all; if the
control is on the pg_dump side then at least we have the chance to make
it a user option later.

Also, you forgot about pg_dump -d.
        regards, tom lane