At 06:24 PM 9/25/2003 , Tom Lane wrote:
>Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org> writes:
> >> We have several beta testers who keep us honest on exactly this point;
> >> they use compilers that do not take //. Personally I wish gcc could
> >> be configured not to have these little non-ANSI-isms ...
I suspect that among the conformance switches, you can find a combination
you like:
----------------------------------
Language Options
-ansi -fall-virtual -fcond-mismatch -fdollars-in-identifiers
-fenum-int-equiv -fexternal-templates -fno-asm -fno-builtin
-fhosted -fno-hosted -ffreestanding -fno-freestanding
-fno-strict-prototype -fsigned-bitfields -fsigned-char
-fthis-is-variable -funsigned-bitfields -funsigned-char
-fwritable-strings -traditional -traditional-cpp -trigraphs
---------------------------------
Also, look at the warning options "-pedantic" and "-pedantic-errors".
-- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE --
This message is intended for the sole use of the individual and entity to whom it is addressed, and may contain
informationthat is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the
intendedaddressee, nor authorized to receive for the intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you may not use,
copy,disclose or distribute to anyone the message or any information contained in the message. If you have received
thismessage in error, please immediately advise the sender by reply email, and delete the message. Thank you.