Re: Anyone working on pg_dump dependency ordering?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andreas Pflug
Тема Re: Anyone working on pg_dump dependency ordering?
Дата
Msg-id 3FC124C8.5040105@pse-consulting.de
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Anyone working on pg_dump dependency ordering?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:

>Rod Taylor <pg@rbt.ca> writes:
>  
>
>>Well.. the second one will be much slower when the foreign keys verify.
>>Primary, unique constraints I'll buy in the create statement. Check
>>constraints and defaults are a little fuzzier.
>>    
>>
>
>FK, primary, and unique constraints are already split out from the
>CREATE TABLE for performance reasons.  We could think about folding them
>back in in a schema-only dump, but in a full dump I don't think it's
>negotiable --- you really want to load the table data before you install
>these constraints.
>  
>
IMHO here we have opposite requirements: The dump/restore process should 
run as fast as possible, so constraints have to be generated separately, 
but pg_dump is also used to reengineer and slightly modify the schema, 
where it's helpful if definitions are grouped. I've been asked for 
complete schema extraction features in pgAdmin3, and I replied 'use 
pg_dump'. It seems that pg_dump tries to serve both requirements, being 
a compromise where two dedicated tools could do it better.

Regards,
Andreas





В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Dennis Bjorklund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Function parameter names
Следующее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Executable files in CVS