Re: Function parameter names

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Dennis Bjorklund
Тема Re: Function parameter names
Дата
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.44.0311232103010.29118-100000@zigo.dhs.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Function parameter names  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Sun, 23 Nov 2003, Tom Lane wrote:

> I see absolutely no need for the call path to do anything with this
> stuff before it reaches the language handler.  All the handlers fetch
> the pg_proc tuple anyway

Even better then!

I've not gotten so far that i've looked much at that code.  What I have
implemented so far is the parser and the extra nodes needed in the Syntax
tree, and I've added a field to pg_proc of currently the wrong type. The
next step for me is to find out how the arrays work inside the backend. 

It's all new code for me so it takes a little more time then what it would 
otherwise. On the bright side is that the code in pg is fairly easy to 
read (but there is a lot).

-- 
/Dennis



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: initdb mkdir_p() doesn't work
Следующее
От: Andreas Pflug
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Anyone working on pg_dump dependency ordering?