>
> And that has nothing to do with user need as a whole, since the care
> level I mentioned is predicated by the developer interest level.
> While I know, Marc, how the whole project got started (I have read the
> first posts), and I appreciate that you, Bruce, Thomas, and Vadim
> started the original core team because you were and are users of
> PostgreSQL, I sincerely believe that in this instance you are out of
> touch with this need of many of today's userbase. And I say that with
> full knowledge of PostgreSQL Inc.'s support role. If given the choice
> between upgrading capability, PITR, and Win32 support, my vote would
> go to upgrading. Then migrating to PITR won't be a PITN.
If someone is willing to pony up 2000.00 per month for a period of at
least 6 months, I will dedicated one of my programmers to the task. So
if you want it bad enough there it is. I will donate all changes,
patches etc.. to the project and I will cover the additional costs that
are over and above the 12,000. If we get it done quicker, all the better.
Sincerely,
Joshua Drake
--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-222-2783 - jd@commandprompt.com - http://www.commandprompt.com
The most reliable support for the most reliable Open Source database.