Re: The ..... worm
От | Guy Fraser |
---|---|
Тема | Re: The ..... worm |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3F5F542C.2040508@incentre.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: The ..... worm (Francois Suter <dba@paragraf.ch>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Francois Suter wrote: >> Mark, would it cause anyone any great problems if posts gated onto the >> newsgroups had their email addresses removed, and would this be >> possible? I can't see that it would cause anybody any problems since >> casual readers could then still read/post to the group, and anyone >> involved with any of the postgresql lists long enough for this to be a >> problem would probably end up subscribing via email anyway. Anyone else >> have any feelings on this? I know it's too late for most of us but it >> might help some newbies... > > > I am not sure this is really going to help, because the e-mail > addresses are also harvested from the web-based archives. Still > doesn't such a reknowned ML tool as Majordomo have a feature that can > hide e-mail addresses (like automatically write them as someone AT any > DOT com) in the web archives? > > Cheers. > > --------------- > Francois > > Home page: http://www.monpetitcoin.com/ > > "Would Descartes have programmed in Pascal?" - Umberto Eco > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command > (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org) > > Unfortunatly harvesting (.*) at (.*)( dot (.*)){1,3} is not difficult either. I would not be suprised if harvesting tools don't already support most obfuscation techniques. The only way to quell spam is by having laws put in place that will make such activities illegal, and to force ISP's to enforce a minimum standard for their acceptable use policy. I work for an ISP and we have dumped a number of customers for spam related activities. Even though there is nothing legaly wrong with what they were doing, it is against our acceptable use policy. Unsolicited email cost us money, usualy more than what the service costs the perpetrator. In Canada their are general rules that CAIP {Canadian Assosiation of Internet Providers} expect members to follow. On the other hand starting in January 2004 the new privacy laws come into effect in Canada and in some ways may protect unsolicited email perpetrators by making customers log activities private. Although in raw form, ISP are expected to keep archives of logs in case a warant is issued. It makes enforcement of AUP's difficult, but internet access is not a right and we are not obliged to renew access to anyone once the service they paid for expires. If more ISP's banned such activities, there would not be such a problem. But I know from experience that once you have tracked down a spammer or hacker, it can be next to impossible to get many ISP's to stop the perpetrator. Most of the time law enforcement are just as disinterested, unless the action is media worthy. Good luck -- Guy Fraser Network Administrator The Internet Centre 780-450-6787 , 1-888-450-6787 There is a fine line between genius and lunacy, fear not, walk the line with pride. Not all things will end up as you wanted, but you will certainly discover things the meek and timid will miss out on.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: