Re: [HACKERS] kqueue

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Rui DeSousa
Тема Re: [HACKERS] kqueue
Дата
Msg-id 38D69889-4F5D-440F-ADE9-ED0902F5D99C@crazybean.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] kqueue  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] kqueue
Список pgsql-hackers


On Jan 22, 2020, at 2:19 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

I cannot see any improvement on either FreeBSD 12 or NetBSD 8.1,
either as to net TPS or as to CPU load.  If anything, the TPS
rate is a bit lower with the patch, though I'm not sure that
that effect is above the noise level.

It's certainly possible that to see any benefit you need stress
levels above what I can manage on the small box I've got these
OSes on.  Still, it'd be nice if a performance patch could show
some improved performance, before we take any portability risks
for it.


Tom,

Here is two charts comparing a patched and unpatched system.  These systems are very large and have just shy of thousand connections each with averages of 20 to 30 active queries concurrently running at times including hundreds if not thousand of queries hitting the database in rapid succession.  The effect is the unpatched system generates a lot of system load just handling idle connections where as the patched version is not impacted by idle sessions or sessions that have already received data.  





Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Magnus Hagander
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Online checksums patch - once again
Следующее
От: Ranier Vilela
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCH] Windows port, fix some resources leaks