Re: [HACKERS] Date/time on glibc2 linux
| От | Thomas G. Lockhart |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Date/time on glibc2 linux |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 36745CAD.8E4F2EC1@alumni.caltech.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Date/time on glibc2 linux (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Date/time on glibc2 linux
Re: [HACKERS] Date/time on glibc2 linux Re: [HACKERS] Date/time on glibc2 linux Re: [HACKERS] Date/time on glibc2 linux |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
> Well, we have a bug report against 6.4, so my inclination is to change
> it in both trees. We know that the current code is broken on at least
> one major platform. I think that outweighs the unproven possibility
> that the other way might be broken somewhere...
OK, I applied the fix (confined to backend/utils/adt/nabstime.c) to both
CVS trees. This swaps the checking of HAVE_INT_TIMEZONE and HAVE_TM_ZONE
so that the TM_ZONE takes precedence.
This single-file patch should be a candidate for removal if others run
into trouble when testing.
One thing I wasn't certain about was the use of #error in non-gcc
compilers. Is that a standard feature?
- Tom
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: