On 16/12/2020 01:23, Vik Fearing wrote:
> On 12/15/20 5:54 PM, Adrian Klaver wrote:
>> On 12/15/20 8:15 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>> On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 9:29 PM Adrian Klaver
>>> <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com> wrote:
>>>> On 12/14/20 9:21 AM, Michael Christofides wrote:
>>>>> Hi there,
>>> Now, we should definitely not go for a design that's just for
>>> smartphones. Arguably we should also not go for one that is primarily
>>> for smartphones. But the current one is *terrible* on smartphones, and
>>> we should make it not terrible. It should of course not be done at the
>>> expense of access from computers, but what we have now isn't
>>> particularly great there either. I'm sure we can find a way to make it
>>> a big improvement on small devices and a small improvement on big
>>> devices, compared to what we have now.
>> Is it possible to do what Wikipedia does?:
>>
>> Computers:
>> en.wikipedia.org
>>
>> Mobile:
>> en.m.wikipedia.org
>
> It is possible, but we should not do this. There should be one site and
> one html. Then media queries in the css can decide how to display it
> for desktops, mobile, printers, and more. No javascript required, either.
Agreed, this can work without any JS, or duplicating the content.
This discussion got stuck somehow, what is needed to implement one or
all of the proposals?
Thanks,
--
Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum
German PostgreSQL User Group
European PostgreSQL User Group - Board of Directors
Volunteer Regional Contact, Germany - PostgreSQL Project