Re: [HACKERS] pl/perl extension fails on Windows

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: [HACKERS] pl/perl extension fails on Windows
Дата
Msg-id 32468.1500498091@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] pl/perl extension fails on Windows  (Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] pl/perl extension fails on Windows  (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>)
Re: [HACKERS] pl/perl extension fails on Windows  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail.com> writes:
> Here are the list of macros and variables from 'intrpvar.h' file that
> are just defined in perl module but not in plperl on Windows,

> #ifdef PERL_USES_PL_PIDSTATUS
> PERLVAR(I, pidstatus,   HV *)       /* pid-to-status mappings for waitpid */
> #endif

> #ifdef PERL_SAWAMPERSAND
> PERLVAR(I, sawampersand, U8)        /* must save all match strings */
> #endif

I am really suspicious that this means your libperl was built in an unsafe
fashion, that is, by injecting configuration choices as random -D switches
in the build process rather than making sure the choices were recorded in
perl's config.h.  As an example, looking at the perl 5.24.1 headers on
a Fedora box, it looks to me like PERL_SAWAMPERSAND could only get defined
if PERL_COPY_ON_WRITE were not defined, and the only way that that can
happen is if PERL_NO_COW is defined, and there are no references to the
latter anyplace except in this particular #if defined test in perl.h.

Where did your perl installation come from, anyway?  Are you sure the .h
files match up with the executables?
        regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Mark Rofail
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: Foreign Key Arrays
Следующее
От: Álvaro Hernández Tortosa
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Authentication mechanisms categorization