Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Instead of trying (and failing) to allow <> at the end of

On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 1:12 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Jaime Casanova <jcasanov@systemguards.com.ec> writes:
>> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 1:00 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> No, I intentionally didn't back-patch that.  The only benefit of the
>>> change is throwing a useful error message for questionable syntax.
>
>> then, maybe a fix in the docs of back branches?
>
> What's to fix?  The documentation already makes it quite clear where
> you're supposed to put the label.  I think documenting the code's
> actual behavior could only confuse people.
>

ah! yeah! sorry for the noise... it was just the need to say something
else... ;)

--
Atentamente,
Jaime Casanova
Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL
Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas
Guayaquil - Ecuador
Cel. +59387171157