RE: view performance

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Ansley
Тема RE: view performance
Дата
Msg-id 2D50E16224C8D311B183009027452B476AFCC8@INTEC003
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на view performance  (Loïc TREGOUËT <loic@ext.cri74.org>)
Ответы RE: view performance  (Mario Amado Alves <maa@di.fct.unl.pt>)
Список pgsql-admin

If your tables are indexed on date, among other things, the performance should be as good as it is now.

MikeA

>>   -----Original Message-----
>>   From: Loïc TREGOUËT [mailto:loic@ext.cri74.org]
>>   Sent: 14 June 2000 13:26
>>   To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
>>   Subject: [ADMIN] view performance
>>  
>>  
>>   Hello ,
>>  
>>       I use a database to store log files . I have 2 Million
>>   rows by year
>>   .
>>   I want the maximum of performance when i access them from
>>   my web site so
>>   i've started to make one table by year :
>>   log2000 : contain all the log information of the year 2000
>>   log 1999 : ..
>>  
>>   I think now it's a bad idea because when i want to select
>>   on two table i
>>   have :
>>   column x is ambiguous !
>>  
>>   But if i use only one table , it will be a huge table i will lose
>>   performance . Isn't it ?
>>  
>>   If i use view , i will not increase the performance
>>   because it's just a
>>   view and not a table properly . Isn't it ?
>>  
>>               Please help me   , thanks
>>  
>>  
>>   loic@ext.cri74.org
>>  

В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Loïc TREGOUËT
Дата:
Сообщение: view performance
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: copy command and indexes