Re: [RFC] Change the default of update_process_title to off

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 5:53 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
>> What's our take on backpatching such changes? Should this be 9.6 only, or
>> back further?

> I would have thought this was a master-only change, although
> back-patching it to 9.6 would be OK if it gets done RSN.  I don't
> think changing GUC defaults in released branches is a good idea.

I agree with fixing 9.6, but not further back.
        regards, tom lane