Re: [RFC] Change the default of update_process_title to off

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: [RFC] Change the default of update_process_title to off
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmoYLv0btq6sGzROy5iu+6MwQ9gUh1_yaEp4jeTwBErhggQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [RFC] Change the default of update_process_title to off  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Ответы Re: [RFC] Change the default of update_process_title to off  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 5:53 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
> What's our take on backpatching such changes? Should this be 9.6 only, or
> back further?

I would have thought this was a master-only change, although
back-patching it to 9.6 would be OK if it gets done RSN.  I don't
think changing GUC defaults in released branches is a good idea.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: David Steele
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: patch proposal
Следующее
От: Greg Stark
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Let's get rid of the separate minor version numbers for shlibs