Re: [RFC] Change the default of update_process_title to off

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Magnus Hagander
Тема Re: [RFC] Change the default of update_process_title to off
Дата
Msg-id CABUevEyTftGFgn1Myr9ouEt-MNcb9va1+GfSYAtPmC5rXsrzPg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [RFC] Change the default of update_process_title to off  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: [RFC] Change the default of update_process_title to off  ("Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения


On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 3:37 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 5:53 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
>> What's our take on backpatching such changes? Should this be 9.6 only, or
>> back further?

> I would have thought this was a master-only change, although
> back-patching it to 9.6 would be OK if it gets done RSN.  I don't
> think changing GUC defaults in released branches is a good idea.

I agree with fixing 9.6, but not further back.

Good, that pretty much aligns with what I was thinking.

Applied and backpatched to 9.6.
 
--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Oskari Saarenmaa
Дата:
Сообщение: Use pread and pwrite instead of lseek + write and read
Следующее
От: Victor Wagner
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Use pread and pwrite instead of lseek + write and read