Re: invalid memory alloc request size from pg_stat_activity?
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: invalid memory alloc request size from pg_stat_activity? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 28926.1557242067@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: invalid memory alloc request size from pg_stat_activity? (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: invalid memory alloc request size from pg_stat_activity?
|
| Список | pgsql-bugs |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> Hmm, but 102400 is only 100kB, nowhere near the 1GB-1 limit, so there's
> something odd going on there.
I can reproduce the described behavior by also setting max_connections
to something around 16K.
Now, it seems pretty silly to me to be burning in excess of 1GB of shmem
just for the current-query strings, and then that much again in every
backend that reads pg_stat_activity. But should we be telling people they
can't do it? I'm working on a patch to use MemoryContextAllocHuge for
the "localactivity" buffer in pgstat_read_current_status. It might seem
dumb now, but perhaps in ten years it'll be common.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: