Re: Lock partitions
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Lock partitions |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 28122.1161191921@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Lock partitions (Mark Wong <markw@osdl.org>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Lock partitions
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Mark Wong <markw@osdl.org> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Hmm, what sort of errors are we talking about?
> ERROR: too many LWLocks taken
That really shouldn't happen ... are you sure you did a full recompile
after changing NUM_LOCK_PARTITIONS?
Actually ... wait a moment. The default value of NUM_LOCK_PARTITIONS
is already 16 (1 << LOG2_NUM_LOCK_PARTITIONS where the latter is 4).
Are you saying you set LOG2_NUM_LOCK_PARTITIONS to 16? That would be
way too many partitions. I was thinking of testing
LOG2_NUM_LOCK_PARTITIONS in the range of about 2 to 5.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: