Tom Lane wrote:
> Mark Wong <markw@osdl.org> writes:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Hmm, what sort of errors are we talking about?
>
>> ERROR: too many LWLocks taken
>
> That really shouldn't happen ... are you sure you did a full recompile
> after changing NUM_LOCK_PARTITIONS?
>
> Actually ... wait a moment. The default value of NUM_LOCK_PARTITIONS
> is already 16 (1 << LOG2_NUM_LOCK_PARTITIONS where the latter is 4).
> Are you saying you set LOG2_NUM_LOCK_PARTITIONS to 16? That would be
> way too many partitions. I was thinking of testing
> LOG2_NUM_LOCK_PARTITIONS in the range of about 2 to 5.
Oops, I can't read bit shifting. =p I'll do again.
Mark