Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> I'm all for doing this client-side.
> Uh, why would we do this client-side rather than server-side? If we do
> it server-side, all interfaces get it.
1. The API that's being implemented is JDBC-specific.
2. Even if you want to argue that it would be generally useful to have
such a feature, it would certainly require additional client-side
programming to make each client interface make use of it.
regards, tom lane