Re: Call for objections: deprecate postmaster -o switch?

Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> This is the part that threw me off.  I see in the postmaster docs under
> -c:
>       On some systems it is also possible to equivalently
>       use    GNU-style     long    options   in   the   form
>       --name=value.

> so we would have to recommend '-c sort-mem=n.'

--sort-mem works, period.  Read the code.

That part of the docs is in error, evidently.
        regards, tom lane