Re: Call for objections: deprecate postmaster -o switch?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: Call for objections: deprecate postmaster -o switch?
Дата
Msg-id 200111250015.fAP0Fwu02586@candle.pha.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Call for objections: deprecate postmaster -o switch?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Call for objections: deprecate postmaster -o switch?  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > This is the part that threw me off.  I see in the postmaster docs under
> > -c:
> >       On some systems it is also possible to equivalently
> >       use    GNU-style     long    options   in   the   form
> >       --name=value.
> 
> > so we would have to recommend '-c sort-mem=n.'
> 
> --sort-mem works, period.  Read the code.
> 
> That part of the docs is in error, evidently.

Docs updated.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Call for objections: deprecate postmaster -o switch?
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: anoncvs busted (was Re: v7.2b3 packages rebuilt ...)