Re: Call for objections: deprecate postmaster -o switch?

Bruce Momjian writes:

> > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > > This is the part that threw me off.  I see in the postmaster docs under
> > > -c:
> > >       On some systems it is also possible to equivalently
> > >       use    GNU-style     long    options   in   the   form
> > >       --name=value.
> >
> > > so we would have to recommend '-c sort-mem=n.'
> >
> > --sort-mem works, period.  Read the code.
> >
> > That part of the docs is in error, evidently.
>
> Docs updated.

Please change it back.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net