Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)
Дата
Msg-id 25111.1064599690@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Ответы Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> Tom Lane writes:
>> so it appears that cygwin's "echo" generates a different newline style
>> than what got put into sql_features.txt.  A possible way to fix this is
>> to put the "\." line into sql_features.txt, but maybe there's a cleaner
>> answer.  Peter, any thoughts?

> There's no clean answer to this on Cygwin.  This specific case is just a
> little problem that we could solve locally, but in general you'll just end
> up annoying people if you require them to use consistent line endings on
> Cygwin.

Yeah, I was wondering whether you wouldn't propose dropping the newline
consistency check.  I'm not very comfortable with that, but maybe we
should.  Bruce?
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: 2-phase commit