Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)
Дата
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.44.0309262034140.11938-100000@peter.localdomain
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane writes:

> Yeah, I was wondering whether you wouldn't propose dropping the newline
> consistency check.  I'm not very comfortable with that, but maybe we
> should.  Bruce?

I don't mind if we keep it on pure-POSIX platforms.  But one of the nicer
developments on Windows in recent(?) times is that you can actually use
any kind of line separator and most programs still work correctly (with
the notable exception of Notepad).  The drawback of this is that you never
really know what kind of line separator a program is actually going to
write, especially when you start mixing Cygwin, MinGW, and native.  So
this newline consistency check is not only going to be pretty annoying on
Windows, it's going to cancel a feature of the operating system
environment.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)
Следующее
От: "scott.marlowe"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)