Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] pg_dump primary keys

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] pg_dump primary keys
Дата
Msg-id 23913.944935124@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] pg_dump primary keys  (wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck))
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] pg_dump primary keys  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Re: Re: [PATCHES] pg_dump primary keys  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> What though if a function accesses a table? Which one goes first? Do we
>> have to maintain a network of dependencies in pg_dump? Eventually we'll
>> probably have to, with all the foreign key stuff coming up. Gloomy
>> prospects.

Couldn't we solve this by the simple expedient of dumping all the
objects in the database in OID order?

Expecting pg_dump to parse function bodies to discover what
relations/types are mentioned doesn't look appetizing at all...
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Gunther Schadow
Дата:
Сообщение: UNICODE characters vs. BINARY
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] LONG