Re: Re: [PATCHES] pg_dump primary keys

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: Re: [PATCHES] pg_dump primary keys
Дата
Msg-id 200006011757.NAA18771@candle.pha.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] pg_dump primary keys  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Added to TODO list.

> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >> What though if a function accesses a table? Which one goes first? Do we
> >> have to maintain a network of dependencies in pg_dump? Eventually we'll
> >> probably have to, with all the foreign key stuff coming up. Gloomy
> >> prospects.
> 
> Couldn't we solve this by the simple expedient of dumping all the
> objects in the database in OID order?
> 
> Expecting pg_dump to parse function bodies to discover what
> relations/types are mentioned doesn't look appetizing at all...
> 
>             regards, tom lane
> 
> ************
> 


--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: frank
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Re: ODBC patch
Следующее
От: Keith Parks
Дата:
Сообщение: Problems with recent CVS versions and Solaris.