Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] pg_dump primary keys

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] pg_dump primary keys
Дата
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.20.9912120121530.6044-100000@localhost.localdomain
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] pg_dump primary keys  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] pg_dump primary keys  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 1999-12-11, Tom Lane mentioned:

> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >> What though if a function accesses a table? Which one goes first? Do we
> >> have to maintain a network of dependencies in pg_dump? Eventually we'll
> >> probably have to, with all the foreign key stuff coming up. Gloomy
> >> prospects.
> 
> Couldn't we solve this by the simple expedient of dumping all the
> objects in the database in OID order?

Wow, great idea! That might actually solve all (well, most) pg_dump
related problems once and for all. Of course how you get all objects in
the database in oid order is to be determined.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut                  Sernanders väg 10:115
peter_e@gmx.net                   75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/            Sweden




В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
Дата:
Сообщение: Jesus, what have I done (was: LONG)
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Jesus, what have I done (was: LONG)