Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] pg_dump primary keys
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] pg_dump primary keys |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.20.9912120121530.6044-100000@localhost.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] pg_dump primary keys (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] pg_dump primary keys
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 1999-12-11, Tom Lane mentioned: > Peter Eisentraut wrote: > >> What though if a function accesses a table? Which one goes first? Do we > >> have to maintain a network of dependencies in pg_dump? Eventually we'll > >> probably have to, with all the foreign key stuff coming up. Gloomy > >> prospects. > > Couldn't we solve this by the simple expedient of dumping all the > objects in the database in OID order? Wow, great idea! That might actually solve all (well, most) pg_dump related problems once and for all. Of course how you get all objects in the database in oid order is to be determined. -- Peter Eisentraut Sernanders väg 10:115 peter_e@gmx.net 75262 Uppsala http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: