Re: Order changes in PG16 since ICU introduction

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Jun 6, 2023 at 3:25 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Also +1, except that I find "none" a rather confusing choice of name.
>> There *is* a provider, it's just PG itself not either libc or ICU.
>> I thought Joe's suggestion of "internal" made more sense.

> Or perhaps "builtin" or "postgresql".

Either OK by me

            regards, tom lane